"Mr Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize winner, is a longstanding critic of the euro, as well as a leading progressive voice in the US. This book follows a similar volume attacking America’s wafer-thin social protections and endemic inequality. Yet his new book ends up exaggerating the hold that market fundamentalism has taken on Europe. [...] Europe’s low-growth challenge is a real one, as is the threat posed by populist rightwing parties seeking to capitalise on economic discontent. But Mr Stiglitz’s conclusions show a lack of sensitivity to the multi-faceted realities in individual states. That is a pity, given the urgency of the problems the continent faces."

"The Brexiteers may be wolves in sheep’s clothing, but they have a couple of points to make—e.g., the European economy is a tangled mess that defies explanation. A number of its key doctrines, writes the author, are mistaken and damaging. One is the 'austerity doctrine,' which requires governments to keep deficits below 3% of GDP, an arbitrary number that doesn’t make sense. Another is a borrowing from the U.S. that the market knows best, when, 'without strong government actions, competition will erode as firms create barriers to entry…and work hard to reduce competition through mergers and acquisitions.' Debt is, of course, a difficult issue to work around, and European economic leaders have seen it through the lens of moral hazard: 'the risk that the debt mutualization will incentivize countries to become overindebted.' That may be, but something needs to give Europe a jolt, and it won’t be borrowing from American ideas, which often yield only monopoly and inequality. Stiglitz notes, approvingly, that India has low telecom rates because there is so much competition, forcing prices down, while in places like Mexico and the U.S., rates are high because competition is scarce or nonexistent. The author offers recipes for improvement, such as shoring up the European banking union in order to 'prevent macroeconomic harms to the community' and balancing competing doctrines. Europe has fallen behind the U.S. and China in some realms of the economy because of its concern for individual privacy, which hampers the development of artificial intelligence. Most pointedly, the author encourages the EU to stick to its regard for institutional justice, fostering multilateral agreements rather than following the current U.S. administration’s 'retreat from globalization and the global rule of law,' which has benefited no country so much as China. A provocative and accessible case for making the EU stronger rather than allowing it to disintegrate."